Archive for the 'Ray Matthews' Category

Scholarships for E-Government Librarians

The Center for Library and Information Innovation at the iSchool at the University of Maryland College Park, in partnership with the Government Information Online Initiative and the University of Illinois at Chicago, is accepting applications for 20 Master of Library Science (MLS) scholarships. The scholarships are for a new online MLS program focused on e-government services and digital government information.

Applications are due by 1 February 2010, and the program is scheduled to begin in Fall 2010. For more information, see www.liicenter.org/libegov.

From Peggy Garvin, SLA/DGI Blog

Did You Know 4.0

Books are going out the door

The Boston Globe reported a week ago that the Cushing Academy, a prestigious prep school in western Massachusetts, is replacing its 20,000-volume book collection with a “learning center” containing 18 eBook readers and three giant TV screens. It’s replacing the reference desk with a $12,000 espresso machine.

“It’s a little strange, but this is the future.”

ALA executive director Keith Michael Fiels says this is the first library he is aware of to eliminate books.

“When I look at books, I see an outdated technology, like scrolls before books,’’ said James Tracy, headmaster of Cushing and chief promoter of the bookless campus. “Our feeling,” he says, “is that we love books so much that we want our students to not have 20,000, but millions.”

Student Tia Alliy, a 16-year-old junior, said she visits the library nearly every day, but only once looked for a book in the stacks. “Very few students actually read them. And the more we use e-books, the fewer books we have to carry around.’’ Jemmel Billingslea, an 18-year-old senior says, “It’s a little strange, but this is the future.’’

The times are indeed a-changin’. One large library in Utah has replaced a reference service, not with an expresso bar, but with a Delicious account. At least a dozen other libraries I follow have replaced their reference desks with online reference services and in turn replaced those with Ask-a-Librarian Twitter accounts.

Have your deans or city council begun asking if your users are still reading books? Have they indicated that the space occupied by your book stacks might be better used? Is your library still serving a vital community need?

What are the implications of libraries offering collections and services based on usage? Was it a good idea in the past for libraries to eliminate research collections in favor of stocking videos and trendy novels from the best seller lists? Is usage a good indicator of value? Doesn’t it make sense doesn’t it to replace the works of William Shakespeare with big screen TVs offering access to American Idols? After all, they now get more usage (hits) than the Bard.

Libraries are under increasing pressure these days to change the ways we’ve traditionally done things. Is the book just a format medium that needs to be retired? The knee-jerk response to give customers what they want, to keep up with how people are using information, and to seek ways of cutting costs may, in the final analysis, be short sighted. Or, are the downsides of the bookless future things we can address and overcome?

The Cushing Library experience might make a great discussion at your next retreat, board meeting, or graduate seminar.

Here are few links to help you get started (don’t neglect the public’s comments; the discussions are well thought and surprisingly insightful):

Statistics Show Social Media Is Bigger Than You Think

Juan Lee just tweeted this from Socialnomics so you may have already seen it, but if not, it’s definitely worth watching:

“Social Media is Not a Fad” : http://bit.ly/3TVHoG

I hope you enjoy it.

The video is based on the new book by Erick Qualman, “Socialnomics: How Social Media Transforms the Way We Live and Do Business.”

The video is done in a way similar to Palmer DePaulis’ new presentation to the Legislature, Michael Wesch’s “Information R/evolution“, and the classic “Did you Know?” by Karl Fisch, Scott McLeod, and Jeff Brenman (rev. 1.0; rev. 2.0; rev. 3.0 ; rev. 4.0).

I think that it provides numerous implications for those of us in the business of creating online government services.

I’m particularly enthralled with Qualman’s idea that we need to disengage ourselves from building search tools and portals. Instead of people searching, Qualman points to the future as being one in which social media will deliver to people the news, information, products, and services that they want. This future, I think, is months not years away. You can already see this emerging in applications such as Facebook and Amazon.com.

What ideas in the video struck you?

Librarians at the Gate

I’m feeling chilled, nauseaus, and faint.  No, I don’t think it’s the swine flu.

Rather, I just listened to a portion of yesterday’s Democracy Now! interview with Internet Archive founder Brewster Kahle, Google Faces Antitrust Investigation for Agreement to Digitize Millions of Books Online.

I’ve always thought that we librarians were the heroes.  We were the ones out there on the front lines safeguarding the public’s right to free access to information.  We were the ones gathering, microfilming, digitizing, cataloging and otherwise preserving papers, documents, and books and making them available online for present and future generations.

In this great crusade, librarians were among the first adopters of computer technologies.  We have since embraced every search tool, database delivery system, open standard, digitization scheme, and Internet widget to come our way.

But we’ve let our guard down.  In opening wide the gate and in embracing geeks bearing gifts, we’ve discovered an enemy.  Our greater surprise is finding that this enemy is ourselves.

We’ve been lulled by the siren song that benevolent, enlightened library technology corporations can do the job better, cheaper, and more efficiently than armies of local librarians could ever have dreamed of doing.   Overwhelming evidence has convinced us that monopoly giants can do it better.

As a result, the question, once unthinkable:

AMY GOODMAN: Do you see the end of libraries as we know them?

Elicits a nightmarish possibility:

BREWSTER KAHLE: [Long pause]. Libraries as a physical place to go, I think will continue, but if this trend continues, if we let Google make a monopoly here, then we’ll lose what libraries are in terms of repositories of books, places that buy books, own them, be a guardian of them, will cease to exist. Libraries, going forward, may just be subscribers to a few monopoly corporations’ databases.

I wouldn’t have felt so alarmed listening to this had I not recently read Robert Darnton’s essay in The New York Review of BooksGoogle & the Future of Books“. Darnton, by the way, is the director of the Harvard University Library and was a trustee of the New York Public Library. Both institutions were among the first five enthusiastic contributors to the Google Book project when it began in 2004. They’re now having second thoughts.

This week has been unsettling all around. I’m still pondering OCLC’s announcement a few days ago of their cloud-based alternative to traditional library Integrated Library Systems and the merits of Tim Spaulding’s penetrating critiques in his LibraryThing blog.

I’ll let history can be the judge whether alarmists like Kahle, Darnton, and Spaulding are prescient or paranoid.

I need to get back to monitoring my swine flu “twittertape.”

Editorial by Ray Matthews
Government Information Coordinator
Utah State Library

- opinions expressed here are his own -